Name | Successful Passes | Total Passes | Unsuccessful Passes | Key Passes | Assists | Goals | Shots | Take-Ons | Take-On Success % | Unsuccessful Take-Ons | Minutes | Possessions Used | Usage Rate | Positive Outcomes | Negative Outcomes | % Positive |
Costa | 275 | 372 | 97 | 18 | 4 | 10 | 41 | 25 | 35 | 46 | 1144 | 206 | 15.62% | 63 | 143 | 30.58% |
Hazard | 534 | 632 | 98 | 26 | 1 | 7 | 36 | 53 | 72 | 21 | 1077 | 182 | 14.66% | 63 | 119 | 34.62% |
Alonso | 258 | 341 | 83 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 33 | 4 | 666 | 111 | 14.46% | 24 | 87 | 21.62% |
Oscar | 199 | 239 | 40 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 462 | 75 | 14.08% | 27 | 48 | 36.00% |
Moses | 257 | 321 | 64 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 20 | 61 | 13 | 669 | 101 | 13.09% | 24 | 77 | 23.76% |
Willian | 225 | 253 | 28 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 17 | 65 | 9 | 511 | 75 | 12.73% | 38 | 37 | 50.67% |
Pedro | 175 | 210 | 35 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 61 | 9 | 577 | 69 | 10.37% | 25 | 44 | 36.23% |
Ivanovic | 256 | 307 | 51 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 67 | 3 | 563 | 64 | 9.86% | 10 | 54 | 15.63% |
Matic | 683 | 773 | 90 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 43 | 12 | 1135 | 122 | 9.32% | 20 | 102 | 16.39% |
Kante | 767 | 857 | 90 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 67 | 8 | 1170 | 122 | 9.04% | 24 | 98 | 19.67% |
Azpilicueta | 714 | 805 | 91 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 86 | 1 | 1170 | 102 | 7.56% | 10 | 92 | 9.80% |
Luiz | 320 | 376 | 56 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 100 | 0 | 810 | 69 | 7.39% | 13 | 56 | 18.84% |
Terry | 234 | 256 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 370 | 28 | 6.56% | 6 | 22 | 21.43% |
Cahill | 580 | 657 | 77 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 33 | 2 | 1163 | 87 | 6.49% | 8 | 79 | 9.20% |
Courtois | 109 | 164 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1170 | 55 | 4.08% | 0 | 55 | 0.00% |
As you can see, the wing-backs are very involved in this formation. Moses and Alonso both have usage rates that are usually reserved for true wingers and use their possessions pretty efficiently to boot. Their late-breaking runs to open space on the far side after an overload on the near side are truly dangerous, as Spurs found out last weekend. That will be something City need to keep an eye on. I would definitely think a back four is the right play here, as I would not want to rely on some combination of Sterling/KDB/Sane/Navas to track back on them.
The possessions the wing-backs are using had to come from somewhere. Let's take a look at last year's usage rates for comparison:
Player | Successful Passes | Total Passes | Unsuccessful Passes | Key Passes | Assists | Goals | Shots | Take-Ons | Take-On Success % | Unsuccessful Take-Ons | Minutes | Possessions Used | Usage Rate | Positive Outcomes | Negative Outcomes | % Positive |
Fabregas | 2278 | 2700 | 422 | 59 | 7 | 5 | 45 | 23 | 55 | 19 | 2900 | 552 | 15.98% | 111 | 441 | 20.12% |
Oscar | 837 | 1033 | 196 | 26 | 3 | 3 | 52 | 26 | 42 | 36 | 1774 | 313 | 14.81% | 81 | 232 | 25.89% |
Hazard | 1204 | 1403 | 199 | 63 | 3 | 4 | 36 | 89 | 62 | 55 | 2196 | 356 | 13.60% | 102 | 254 | 28.69% |
Willian | 1220 | 1473 | 253 | 75 | 6 | 5 | 60 | 84 | 67 | 41 | 2740 | 435 | 13.35% | 141 | 294 | 32.39% |
Costa | 641 | 824 | 183 | 24 | 6 | 12 | 68 | 40 | 37 | 68 | 2374 | 349 | 12.35% | 98 | 251 | 28.07% |
Pedro | 809 | 966 | 157 | 40 | 2 | 7 | 57 | 52 | 58 | 38 | 2036 | 294 | 12.11% | 99 | 195 | 33.71% |
Kennedy | 248 | 288 | 40 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 26 | 62 | 16 | 560 | 75 | 11.24% | 19 | 56 | 25.36% |
Ramires | 244 | 306 | 62 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 40 | 9 | 616 | 82 | 11.18% | 11 | 71 | 13.41% |
Azpilicueta | 1438 | 1766 | 328 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 30 | 14 | 3202 | 372 | 9.76% | 30 | 342 | 8.06% |
Matic | 1387 | 1577 | 190 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 34 | 38 | 72 | 15 | 2421 | 258 | 8.94% | 53 | 205 | 20.56% |
Rahman | 427 | 513 | 86 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 73 | 3 | 1023 | 98 | 8.04% | 9 | 89 | 9.19% |
Ivanovic | 1051 | 1272 | 221 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 10 | 67 | 5 | 2916 | 267 | 7.69% | 41 | 226 | 15.36% |
Zouma | 578 | 720 | 142 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 4 | 57 | 3 | 1918 | 163 | 7.14% | 18 | 145 | 11.04% |
Courtois | 138 | 303 | 165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 165 | 6.87% | 0 | 165 | 0.00% |
Mikel | 1091 | 1218 | 127 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 20 | 87 | 3 | 1793 | 142 | 6.65% | 12 | 130 | 8.45% |
Cahill | 624 | 751 | 127 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 60 | 2 | 1957 | 145 | 6.22% | 16 | 129 | 11.03% |
Begovic | 96 | 184 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1398 | 88 | 5.29% | 0 | 88 | 0.00% |
Terry | 824 | 917 | 93 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 50 | 2 | 1987 | 107 | 4.52% | 12 | 95 | 11.21% |
Fabregas, Oscar, and Willian aren't featuring as much this year, and all of them had very high usage rates last season. It's Fabregas who is the most interesting case, as he had been a staple of the Chelsea team the past two years as a central midfield creator. This year it's primarily just Kante and Matic in the center behind Costa, and while Matic has contributed six (!) assists so far, I think that assist rate unlikely to continue. The usage rates match the eye test, which says they are functional distributors and defenders, but they leave chance and shot creation to others. Once again, assuming Conte sticks with the same 3-4-3 formation, this means City should probably concentrate on the wide areas when defending.
As for attacking, the 3-4-3 can leave gaps behind the wingbacks certainly. I think Sterling in particular will be important, as he will likely be attacking down Chelsea's left versus Cahill (arguably the weakest of Chelsea's center-backs) and Alonso (who doesn't have the speed to touch him). We'll also need KDB and Silva/Gundogan to be at their very best to not be swallowed whole by Kante and Matic, as that will be key to City establishing their attack. That said, Chelsea don't have a lot of holes on defense, allowing the second-fewest shots on target per Opponent's Possession.
This is by far the toughest Premier League test City have faced so far and I have to say I am not super confident of a City win here. Hopefully the full week of rest will help rejuvenate some players (particularly Fernandinho, who has still played every PL minute) and we'll be able to put out a good performance. No matter what happens though, it should be fascinating to see how the two teams match up.
Casino Resort Tickets - JTM Hub
ReplyDeleteFind 슈어 벳 the latest 공주 출장마사지 2021 event schedule, venue 부천 출장안마 information, directions, and seating charts. Casino Resort in Joliet: Hosts Jan 26, 2022Riojuan Carlos 구리 출장안마 - Dec 18, 문경 출장마사지 2022Terracino Resort